This new equitation treatise gets its originality from the fact
that the author could put at the same level the scientist equitation from the
innate sphere (to feel) to the one of the knowledge (to perceive), reachable
by everyone.
"To understand is to feel" becomes "to understand is
to perceive".
To reach this aim, it seems necessary to explain the term "to feel".
If "to understand is to feel", we can say that "to feel is to
to perceive what is invisible to the naked eye". That is what experience
the gifted person who doesn't need to explain what he does because it is well
made naturally. I.e. this person was given at his birth an arouse of his curiosity
towards the horse, innate faculties allowing him to solve immediately any kind
of problem that can occur, without wondering. This rider will follow an intiation
course instead of a learning one.
Therefore, he knows without having learnt.
Those among us who don't know (the majority), will have to learn to know their
animal to use his capacities in the best way. The learning they will get will
be more of the perception side than the real knowledge. They will need a clinical
approach of the horse. At first, they will have to discover the more or less
serious symptoms of the horse mental and physical bad state thanks to the plain
observation trained by the practice. They will then have "a clear and distinct
perception" (René Descartes, XVIIth century french philosopher)
of the basic problem in front of them. Then they are on the way to solve it.
"Horse Oblige II" is only the illustration of the process.
"Our sensations are purely passive instead of our perceptions or ideas
which are produced by an active principle that judges". (Jean-Jacques Rousseau,
XVIIIth century french philosopher).
![]()
Michel
FEVRIER